The Core i9-13900E is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7402. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900E
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 32 threads
Core i9-13900E vs EPYC 7402
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
152
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900E vs EPYC 7402 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs EPYC 7402 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs EPYC 7402 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Raptor Lake-S | Codename | Rome |
65 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 24 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 36 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
