In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900E is slightly faster than the Core i9-9900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i9-9900K
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-9900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
93%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 i9-9900K Octa-core [8 Core] 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 - Retail Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07KC6V4YF.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
