In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900K is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $120 cheaper!
Core i9-9900K
- Up to 21% cheaper – $449.00 vs $569.00
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 3% better value in Atomfall – $2.06 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 266 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
82%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
78%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
97%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$488.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
95W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
