In Deathloop, the Core i9-13900E is slightly faster than the Core i3-4150T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 232 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4150T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
94%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4150T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4150T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
