In Deathloop, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 9700X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $279 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 93% cheaper – $21.76 vs $301.00
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in Deathloop – $0.09 vs $1.21/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 7 9700X
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop – 247 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
89%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$301
7%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Ryzen 7 9700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Ryzen 7 9700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9700X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
