In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-11400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $262 more expensive!
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 60% cheaper – $176.90 vs $439.00
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall – $0.79 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
42%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
223 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
97%
Price, $
$176.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
