In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $140 more expensive!
Core i9-11900KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 32% cheaper – $298.98 vs $439.00
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall – $1.20 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
93%
Price, $
$439
68%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
63%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
