Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900F - 280 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
