The Core i9-10900K is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Pentium Gold G7400 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $421.09 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Pentium Gold G7400
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 80% cheaper – $103.91 vs $525.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i9-10900K vs Pentium Gold G7400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium Gold G7400
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, $
$103.91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900K vs Pentium Gold G7400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs Pentium Gold G7400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs Pentium Gold G7400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Pentium Gold G7400
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium Gold G7400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | $74.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
