In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10900F is slightly faster than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 171 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
99%
Price, $
$509.86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
