In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10900F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$464.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM5 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
