Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 559 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Core i9-9900K - 198 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $390.00 vs $470.39
- Up to 16% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900 - $1.99 vs $2.38 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
84%
Price, $
$470.39
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $470.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
196
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$390
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $390 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900 | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |