In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $13 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 237 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
- Up to 3% cheaper – $380.99 vs $394.28
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Rust – $1.60 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
227 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
89%
Price, $
$394.28
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
92%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
