In Rust, the Core i7-10700K is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $71 more expensive!
Core i7-10700K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 20% faster in Rust – 284 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 19% cheaper – $298.98 vs $369.99
- Up to 19% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Rust – $1.05 vs $1.56/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
66%
Price, $
$369.99
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
67%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
