In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $331 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 227 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 84% cheaper – $63.33 vs $394.28
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Rust – $0.30 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
17%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
73%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
