In F1 22, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $361 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 5% faster in F1 22 – 376 vs 358 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in F1 22
- Up to 84% cheaper – $69.28 vs $430.29
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in F1 22 – $0.18 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in F1 22
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
358 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
248 FPS
98%
Price, $
$430.29
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
15%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
376 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
254 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
