In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3450S. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $309 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-3450S
- Up to 78% cheaper – $85.00 vs $394.28
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Rust – $0.40 vs $1.74/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
21%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
23%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
76%
Price, $
$85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3450S Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
