In Red Dead Redemption 2, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-3450S and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $345 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-3450S
- Up to 3% faster in Red Dead Redemption 2 – 227 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Red Dead Redemption 2
- Up to 80% cheaper – $85.00 vs $430.29
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Red Dead Redemption 2 – $0.37 vs $1.94/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
221 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
98%
Price, $
$430.29
19%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
19%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-3450S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3450S Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
