In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $41 cheaper!
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 14% cheaper – $247.30 vs $288.00
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 3% better value in Atomfall – $1.14 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
88%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
97%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$333.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
