The Core i7-970 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the EPYC 7402. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-970
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7402
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 12 threads
Core i7-970 vs EPYC 7402
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Average FPS
182
92%
Min 1% FPS
126
93%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
197
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, $
$635.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
100%
Core i7-970 vs EPYC 7402 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-970 vs EPYC 7402 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-970 vs EPYC 7402 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-970 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 19th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Rome |
130 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 12 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
