In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i7-960 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $69 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 26% cheaper – $200.00 vs $269.00
- Up to 26% cheaper
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 50% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 160 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 50% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 10% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $1.68 vs $1.86/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
107 FPS
67%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
60%
Price, $
$200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
90%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
160 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
120 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
74%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
