In Deathloop, the Core i7-960 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $156 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 54% cheaper – $132.34 vs $288.00
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop – $0.59 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
221 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
50%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
