In Atomfall, the Core i7-950 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $184 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 86% cheaper – $31.00 vs $214.99
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Atomfall – $0.16 vs $0.87/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 15 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
188 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
77%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
14%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
