In Atomfall, the Core i7-950 is slower than the Core i3-14100F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $66 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 68% cheaper – $31.00 vs $96.99
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall – $0.16 vs $0.41/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
188 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
82%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
