In Atomfall, the Core i7-950 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9940X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $1258 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 98% cheaper – $31.00 vs $1288.88
- Up to 98% cheaper
- Up to 97% better value in Atomfall – $0.16 vs $5.99/FPS
- Up to 97% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 130 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Core i9-9940X
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i9-9940X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
189 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
88%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1288.88
2%
Value, $/FPS
$5.99/FPS
3%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i9-9940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i9-9940X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9940X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,387.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA2066 |
130 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
