The Core i7-950 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $54.85 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-950
- Up to 39% cheaper – $84.15 vs $139.00
Advantages of the Core i7-7700T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-7700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$139
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
67%
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-7700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-7700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-7700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
