In Atomfall, the Core i7-930 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $60 more expensive!
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $247.30 vs $307.29
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in Atomfall – $1.15 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
87%
Price, $
$307.29
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
70%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 28th, 2010 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
