Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4507 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-920XM - 131 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920XM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |