In Atomfall, the Core i7-875K is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $114 cheaper!
Core i7-875K
- Up to 40% cheaper – $174.02 vs $288.00
- Up to 40% cheaper
- Up to 21% better value in Atomfall – $0.92 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 21% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-875K vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
77%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
60%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
79%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
21%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-875K May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$353.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
