In Atomfall, the Core i7-875K is slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $77 more expensive!
Core i7-875K
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 44% cheaper – $96.99 vs $174.02
- Up to 44% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall – $0.42 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
82%
Price, $
$174.02
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
46%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-875K May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $353.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
