In Atomfall, the Core i7-875K is slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $129 cheaper!
Core i7-875K
- Up to 43% cheaper – $174.02 vs $302.97
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $0.92 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-875K vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
189 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
78%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
57%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
74%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-875K May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$353.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
