In Atomfall, the Core i7-875K is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $54 more expensive!
Core i7-875K
No clear advantages
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 31% cheaper – $119.99 vs $174.02
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-875K vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
189 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$174.02
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
62%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-875K May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $353.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
