In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $288 cheaper!
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 51% cheaper – $275.00 vs $563.41
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall – $1.30 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
84%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
48%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
