In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $45 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $229.89 vs $275.00
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
85%
Price, $
$275
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
71%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
