In Atomfall, the Core i7-860 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $300 cheaper!
Core i7-860
- Up to 70% cheaper – $129.94 vs $429.99
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 14 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
189 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
30%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
