In Atomfall, the Core i7-860 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $169 cheaper!
Core i7-860
- Up to 57% cheaper – $129.94 vs $298.98
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
189 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
43%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
