Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1236 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Core i7-6950X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $327.25 vs $565.00
- Up to 41% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900X - $1.86 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6950X - 179 vs 176 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
176
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$327.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $327.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6950X | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |