In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-6900K is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
Core i7-6900K
- Up to 36% cheaper – $289.95 vs $449.98
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.81 vs $5.29/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 140 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
76 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
89%
Price, $
$289.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.81/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
64%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
72%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
96%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6900K May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $1,089.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA2066 |
140 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
