In Deathloop, the Core i7-6900K is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
Core i7-6900K
- Up to 36% cheaper – $289.95 vs $449.98
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop – $1.31 vs $2.02/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 140 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$289.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
64%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
96%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6900K May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $1,089.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA2066 |
140 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
