Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $122.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-13400F - $0.88 vs $5.59 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6900K - 161 vs 139 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.59/FPS
16%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |