The Core i7-6800K is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $25.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6800K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 33% cheaper – $52.02 vs $78.00
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i7-6800K vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$78
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
74%
Core i7-6800K vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6800K vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6800K vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6800K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
$434.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Zambezi |
140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
15 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |