The Core i7-6800K is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $8.52 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6800K
The Core i5-10400F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-10400F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 5% cheaper – $151.88 vs $160.40
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i7-6800K vs Core i5-10400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
182
97%
Min 1% FPS
121
98%
Price, $
$160.4
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
92%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$151.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Core i7-6800K vs Core i5-10400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6800K vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6800K vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6800K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$434.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
15 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |