In Rust, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-7100T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $54 more expensive!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 220 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
Core i3-7100T
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Up to 68% cheaper – $25.00 vs $79.00
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $0.35/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
31%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
96%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
