In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Core i3-7100T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $54 more expensive!
Core i7-6700T
No clear advantages
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 229 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Up to 68% cheaper – $25.00 vs $79.00
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.10 vs $0.34/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
227 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
99%
Price, $
$79
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
29%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
