In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Core i3-4130 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $38 more expensive!
Core i7-6700T
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 183 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 48% cheaper – $41.00 vs $79.00
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.22 vs $0.44/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
178 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
98%
Price, $
$79
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
50%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
