In Atomfall, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $38 more expensive!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 48% cheaper – $41.00 vs $79.00
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
53%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
97%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
