Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2713 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Core i7-6700K
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $137.40 vs $899.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400F - $1.21 vs $7.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-6700K - 127 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
114
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$137.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $137.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.09/FPS
17%
Price, $
$899.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |