In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-620M is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 15 years and 7 days newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 15 years and 7 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
17%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$332.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
