In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-620M is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer – Feb 28, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
203 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
99%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
