The Core i7-5820K is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-5820K
The Core i5-11600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-11600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i7-5820K vs Core i5-11600 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-5820K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
181
90%
Min 1% FPS
120
91%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
132
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Core i7-5820K vs Core i5-11600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5820K vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5820K vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5820K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-5820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Haswell E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
15 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |